Here’s some uncomfortable news: The world is approaching a critical climate tipping point. According to the United Nations and leading scientific bodies, exceeding the 1.5 °C threshold above pre‑industrial temperatures (at least temporarily) is now considered inevitable.
As I explain further below, this stark warning underscores the urgency of global climate action and the profound implications for ecosystems, economies, and societies.
Why 1.5 °C matters
The 1.5 °C limit was enshrined in the Paris Agreement as a target to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change. Beyond this point, risks of extreme weather, biodiversity loss, and irreversible ice melt rise sharply. For years, policymakers and scientists have emphasised that staying below this threshold is critical for safeguarding vulnerable communities and ecosystems.
However, recent assessments show that the remaining carbon budget for 1.5 °C is vanishing rapidly. At current emission rates (around 46 billion tonnes of CO₂ annually) the budget could be exhausted by early 2028. This means that even with aggressive mitigation, a temporary overshoot is almost certain.
UN and WMO projections
The UN Secretary‑General António Guterres recently declared that “a temporary overshoot above 1.5 °C is now inevitable, starting, at the latest, in the early 2030s.” The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reinforces this outlook, projecting an 86% chance that at least one year between 2025 and 2029 will exceed 1.5 °C. There is also a 70% probability that the five‑year average will breach this threshold.
These figures reflect not only human‑driven emissions but also natural variability, such as El Niño events, which amplify global temperatures. While a single year above 1.5 °C does not mean the Paris target is permanently lost, as the agreement refers to long‑term average, it signals how close the world is to a tipping point.

What an overshoot means
A temporary overshoot could trigger irreversible changes. Ice sheets and glaciers may accelerate melting, raising sea levels for centuries. Coral reefs, already under stress, could face near‑total collapse. Extreme heatwaves, droughts, and floods would become more frequent and severe, threatening food security and human health.
The difference between 1.5 °C and 2 °C is not marginal. At 2 °C, the likelihood of devastating climate impacts multiplies, from mass species extinction to widespread displacement of people. Every fraction of a degree matters.
Beyond environmental damage, exceeding 1.5 °C will have profound economic and social costs. Agriculture faces declining yields, particularly in regions already vulnerable to drought. Coastal cities will need massive investment in flood defences, while insurance markets could become unstable due to escalating disaster claims. Developing nations, which contribute least to emissions, will bear the brunt of these impacts, deepening global inequality.
Is there still hope?
Despite the inevitability of a short‑term breach, scientists stress that the long‑term trajectory is still within human control. The world can return below 1.5 °C later this century if emissions fall sharply and carbon removal technologies scale up. This would require cutting global greenhouse gas emissions by about 43% by 2030 and achieving net zero around 2050.
Such a transformation demands unprecedented action: phasing out fossil fuels, accelerating renewable energy deployment, investing in carbon capture, and implementing systemic changes in agriculture, transport, and industry. Current pledges and policies fall far short of these requirements.
The path forward
The UN’s warning is not a call for despair but for urgency. Every year of delay locks in higher risks and costs. While exceeding 1.5 °C is inevitable in the near term, limiting the overshoot and returning to safer levels remains possible. The choices made this decade will determine whether humanity faces manageable challenges or catastrophic consequences.
|
by Doğan Erbek and STF Team |


